Kingsights Logo
Nimzo-Larsen Attack report from your own games

Nimzo-Larsen Attack report from your own games

The eccentric 1.b3. See if your long-diagonal pressure translates into wins.

Free • Instant Analysis • Works with any Chess.com username

What we analyze in your Nimzo-Larsen games

Your long diagonal pressure effectiveness

Your central break timing (d4 or e4)

Your transposition management

Your piece coordination from the b2 bishop

Your win rate in unique positions

Key Positions to Know

Critical concepts every Nimzo-Larsen Attack player should understand

The Great Bb2 Bishop

After 1.b3 and 2.Bb2, White's bishop controls the long diagonal and pressures both e5 and g7. This bishop is the engine of the entire Nimzo-Larsen strategy — it can't be easily challenged and creates long-term pressure on the opponent's setup throughout the game.

Flexible Central Strategy

Unlike most openings, the Nimzo-Larsen doesn't commit to a specific pawn center immediately. White can play e3-d4 (a QGD-like setup), e4-d3 (a King's Indian Attack), or f4 for an aggressive Dutch-style setup. This flexibility makes it hard for Black to prepare specifically.

Pressure on d5

The Bb2 bishop most commonly targets the d5 pawn or the d5 square. If Black plays ...d5, the bishop immediately targets it from afar. White often reinforces this pressure with Nf3 and develops naturally, while the bishop creates a permanent, quiet threat that is difficult to neutralize.

Opening Statistics

Original research from 6,116 real amateur games — data you won't find anywhere else.

Avg. Game Length
awaiting data
Underdog Wins
awaiting data
Quick Finishes
awaiting data
Endgame Reach
awaiting data
White's Edge
+4.7%
Favors BlackEqualFavors White

At 1200-1400

📊White's edge is +4.7% — a slight advantage for White.

How This Opening Changes as You Improve

RatingGamesWhite's Edge
800-1000741
+2.6%50 /0 /47
1000-1200957
+2.0%50 /0 /48
1200-14001,244
+4.7%51 /0 /46
1400-16001,526
-0.9%48 /0 /49
1600-18001,648
+5.0%51 /0 /46

Based on 6,116 games · Updated March 2026

Common Nimzo-Larsen patterns we detect

We automatically check if you fall for these specific traps.

About the Nimzo-Larsen Attack

The Nimzo-Larsen Attack (1.b3) was popularized by Danish GM Bent Larsen. White immediately prepares Bb2 to fianchetto the queenside bishop, controlling the long a1-h8 diagonal and influencing the center from afar. It avoids all mainstream theory and creates unique strategic positions.

We analyze your strategic use of the Bb2 bishop, central break timing, and overall positional understanding. We identify where hypermodern play becomes passive.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Nimzo-Larsen Attack analysis

The Nimzo-Larsen Attack begins with 1.b3, immediately preparing to fianchetto the queen's bishop to b2, where it will control the long a1-h8 diagonal. The opening is named after Aron Nimzowitsch, who developed the hypermodern philosophy behind it, and Bent Larsen, who used it extensively in elite competition in the 1960s-70s. Rather than occupying the center with pawns immediately, White uses the b2 bishop and flexible pawn structure to fight for central control from the flanks.
After 1.b3 Bb2, White's plan depends on Black's response. The typical setup involves Nf3, e3, and eventually d4 or d3 with a fianchettoed bishop creating pressure along the long diagonal. The b2 bishop eyes the e5 and d4 squares and supports f2-f4 in attacking setups. White keeps the center flexible, avoiding commitments until Black reveals their setup. Against e5 or e6, White often plays e4; against d5, White may use c4 to challenge. The hypermodern strategy is to undermine the center rather than occupy it.
Bent Larsen was one of the most creative players of his era and used 1.b3 regularly at the highest level, including in his match against World Champion Boris Spassky. Larsen valued the practical advantages: opponents were forced out of preparation immediately, the position demanded original thinking rather than memorized theory, and the resulting middlegames rewarded understanding over rote knowledge. His famous loss to Spassky in the 1970 Match of the Century (10 wins in a row for Spassky) did not diminish the opening's credibility — it was Spassky's exceptional form, not a flaw in 1.b3.
A common practical trap arises against 1.b3 e5 2.Bb2 Nc6 3.e3 if Black plays 3...d5 4.Bb5 Bd7?? (a routine developing move). White plays 5.Nf3 and if 5...f6?? trying to support e5, White responds 6.Bxc6! Bxc6 7.Nxe5! fxe5 8.Qh5+, winning the pawn and creating a devastating attack. The aggressive potential of the Bb2-Nf3 combination creates threats that look innocuous but punish passive play severely — a hallmark of Nimzowitsch's original hypermodern philosophy.

How valuable was this analysis?

Ready to master your openings?

Get a complete breakdown of your play across all openings, not just the Nimzo-Larsen Attack.

No credit card required • Works with Chess.com