Kingsights Logo
Dutch Defense report from your own games

Dutch Defense report from your own games

An aggressive stance against d4. See if your fighting spirit brings home the points.

Free • Instant Analysis • Works with any Chess.com username

Sample Report Preview

Here's what a personalized Dutch Defense analysis looks like

Sample Report

Dutch Defense Report

19 GAMESSample Data
Win Rate
42%

Performance vs Other Openings

Dutch Defense42% Win
Other Openings49% Win

Key Insights

The f5-pawn advance is weakening your king shelter in 68% of games
black
High Impact

King Safety Collapsing on the Kingside

What this means
Your kingside pawn structure after ...f5 creates chronic weaknesses along the e8-h5 diagonal and the g-file. In 13 of 19 Dutch games, your opponent successfully exploited these weaknesses with Qd1-h5, Bc1-h6, or g2-g4 pawn storms. Your king was directly involved in a mating attack in 7 games. In Leningrad game #93, White's Qh5 on move 14 was already decisive because your g7-bishop was blocked by your own pawns on f5 and e6. Your blunder rate in the Dutch (9.4%) is the highest of any opening you play.
How to improve
Prioritize king safety by keeping the g7-bishop active and unblocked. In the Leningrad, delay ...f5 until you have completed ...Bg7, ...O-O, ...d6, and ...Nc6. In the Stonewall, always play ...Bd6 before ...f5 to cover h2-b8 diagonal. Consider ...h6 prophylaxis to prevent Bc1-h6 ideas. Never allow your e6-pawn and f5-pawn to both become targets.
#king-safety#pawn-structure#defense
White is consistently breaking through with e2-e4 before you can establish a blockade
black
High Impact

Losing Control of the e4 Square

What this means
In 11 of 19 games, White successfully played e4 before move 15. When e4 is achieved, your win rate drops to 18% (2 wins in 11 games). In the 8 games where you prevented e4 or delayed it past move 15, your win rate jumps to 75%. The e4 break undermines your entire Dutch structure — it opens the center where your king is vulnerable and renders the f5-pawn backward or isolated. Game #154 shows the typical collapse: e4 on move 12, fxe4 Nxe4 and White dominated every central square.
How to improve
Preventing e4 is the central strategic battle of the Dutch. In the Stonewall, the e4 square is naturally covered by pawns on d5 and f5 — ensure d5 is played early. In the Leningrad, use ...Nc6-e5 or ...d6 and ...e5 setups to blockade. In the Classical, consider ...Qe8 and ...Qh5 to add pressure to e4. Always have a concrete plan for what happens if e4 is played anyway.
#central-control#pawn-breaks#prevention
Your kingside attacks in the Stonewall are generating real winning chances
black

Stonewall Attacking Setup Shows Potential

What this means
In your 8 Stonewall games, you successfully launched a kingside attack in 5 of them, with the standard plan of ...Qe8-h5, ...Rf6-h6, and ...Nf6-e4. Your attack succeeded in 4 of those 5 games, giving you a 80% conversion rate when the attack gets going. The Stonewall's 50% win rate is your best Dutch variation. In game #217, your Qh5/Rh6/Ne4 battery created a mating attack by move 26 that your opponent could not defend.
How to improve
Double down on the Stonewall as your primary Dutch weapon. The attacking plan is clear: ...Bd6, ...Qe8, ...Qh5, ...Nf6-e4, ...Rf8-f6-h6. Memorize the move order and practice the typical sacrificial patterns on h2 and g3. Pair this with queenside restraint (...b6, ...Bb7) so White cannot ignore your kingside to attack on the other flank.
#attack#strengths#kingside

Top Variations

1
Stonewall Variation
8 games
2
Leningrad Variation
7 games
3
Classical Dutch
4 games

Enter your Chess.com username to see your personalized report

What we analyze in your Dutch Defense games

Your kingside attacking success rate

Your handling of the Leningrad setup with g6

Your tactical awareness in the Stonewall structure

Your resilience against anti-Dutch systems

Your piece coordination from the fianchetto

Your defensive technique when White attacks e6

Key Positions to Know

Critical concepts every Dutch Defense player should understand

Fighting for e4

With 1...f5, Black immediately contests the e4 square. This is aggressive and double-edged — Black gains kingside attacking chances but weakens the king. The Dutch is for players who want to fight for the initiative as Black.

The Stonewall Formation

The pawns on f5-e6-d5 form a "stonewall" that locks the center. Black gets a rock-solid position with kingside attacking chances via Qh5 or ...Ne4. The weakness is the e5 square and the bad dark-squared bishop.

Kingside Attack

In the Leningrad Dutch (with ...g6 and ...Bg7), Black fianchettoes and prepares ...f4 or ...e5. The g7 bishop supports central and kingside operations. This setup resembles a King's Indian with extra aggression.

Opening Statistics

Original research from 1,700 real amateur games — data you won't find anywhere else.

Avg. Game Length
—awaiting data
Underdog Wins
—awaiting data
Quick Finishes
—awaiting data
Endgame Reach
—awaiting data
White's Edge
+7.7%
Favors BlackEqualFavors White

At 1200-1400

📊White's edge is +7.7% — White has a clear advantage at this level.

How This Opening Changes as You Improve

RatingGamesWhite's Edge
800-1000219
+5.0%51 /0 /46
1000-1200264
+9.5%53 /0 /43
1200-1400271
+7.7%53 /0 /45
1400-1600394
-3.8%47 /0 /51
1600-1800552
+2.1%50 /0 /48

Based on 1,700 games · Updated March 2026

Common Dutch patterns we detect

We automatically check if you fall for these specific traps.

About the Dutch Defense

The Dutch Defense (1. d4 f5) is an aggressive response to 1. d4 where Black immediately fights for control of the e4 square. It leads to unbalanced positions with attacking chances.

We analyze your attacking play, structural integrity of your kingside, and success in the different Dutch systems. We identify weaknesses in your aggressive approach.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Dutch Defense analysis

The Dutch Defense begins with 1. d4 f5 — an immediate, bold claim on the e4 square. Unlike 1...d5 (which fights for the centre directly) or 1...Nf6 (which waits), 1...f5 asserts control of e4 from move one and signals aggressive intent. The trade-off is real: the f5 pawn weakens e6 and creates dark square holes. But in exchange, Black gets a fighting position where passive play is impossible. Named after correspondence player Elias Stein (1789), though called 'Dutch' by Howard Staunton in the 1840s.
The Stonewall structure is formed by Black's pawns on d5-e6-f5 (and often c6). The interlocking pawn chain controls key light squares, especially e4, but permanently weakens d4 and g6. The knight on e4 is the critical piece because it occupies Black's best outpost on a square that cannot be attacked by White's pawns. A knight on e4 supports kingside attacks (Qe8-Qh5, Rf6-Rg6), creates tactical threats, and ties down White's pieces.
The Stonewall (pawns on d5-e6-f5) and Leningrad Dutch (pawns on g6-f5 with Bg7 fianchetto) are opposite in character. The Stonewall is positional — it relies on piece manoeuvres (Qe8-Qh5, Ne4, Bd7-Be8-Bg6) and the structural Ne4 outpost. The Leningrad is dynamic — Black fianchettoes with ...Bg7 and plays for ...e5 to challenge White's centre, resembling a King's Indian with f5. The Leningrad is preferred by tactical players (Nakamura); the Stonewall by positional ones (Botvinnik, Kramnik). Both are theoretically viable.
The Staunton Gambit (2. e4 fxe4 3. Nc3) is White's most aggressive response and the main test of 1...f5. Black must play 3...Nf6 (not 3...d5). The critical line runs 4. Bg5 e6 5. Nxe4 Be7 — developing solidly and returning the pawn. The trap (8...b6?? 9.Nxf6+ gxf6 10.Qd2) punishes passive development — Black must play ...Nc6 or ...d5 actively.
The Leningrad Overextension occurs after 1. d4 f5 2. g3 Nf6 3. Bg2 g6 4. Nf3 Bg7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 d6 7. Nc3 c6 8. d5 e5??. Black's premature 8...e5 walks into 9. dxe6 Bxe6 10. Ng5, attacking the bishop. After 10...Bc8, White has won a free pawn. The correct plan is to prepare ...e5 with ...Na6 or ...Nc6 first, ensuring the bishop has a safe retreat.
Mikhail Botvinnik used the Stonewall Dutch as his primary weapon because its structure matched his methodical, long-term planning style. Hikaru Nakamura favours the Leningrad because its sharp, tactical character suits his aggressive style: the ...e5 break creates imbalances where his tactical sharpness is decisive. Nakamura's victory over Carlsen at Bilbao 2011 with the Leningrad demonstrated the opening remains a viable weapon at the very top level.

Explore Related Openings

Analyze other openings similar to the Dutch Defense

King's Indian Defense

Are you a true King's Indian warrior? Find out if your attacking instincts translate into wins.

Analyze Now

Grunfeld Defense

Strike at the heart of White's center. See if your Grunfeld counterplay is as sharp as it should be.

Analyze Now

Benoni Defense

Play for imbalance and fight. See if your Benoni aggression pays off.

Analyze Now

How valuable was this analysis?

Ready to master your openings?

Get a complete breakdown of your play across all openings, not just the Dutch Defense.

No credit card required • Works with Chess.com